On Tuesday, April 15th, posted a story about Western Washington University in Bellingham, Washington titled “University calls the amount of white people on campus a ‘failure,’ asks for ideas on how to have fewer.” Their story ran a quote from the WWU website “How do we make sure that in future years ‘we are not as white as we are today?'”. Obviously this type of anti-whitism from WWU required a response from the pro-white community.

If a day of global pro-white activism becomes an unexpected internet sensation, and if enough journalists bother to scribble columns about how the event in question never really took place, then the event apparently didn’t take place. Last Month’s White Man March seems to have given birth to this strange new law of physics, and with it a brand-new genre of increasingly nervous anti-white commentary.
One special instance comes courtesy of Laurie Penny, a full-figured feminist who suggests in her latest New Statesman column that the only thing more “imaginary” than the White Man March is the program of White Genocide itself, which (according to Penny) “isn’t a real thing.” Nonetheless, Ms. Penny evidently thinks the resurgence of pro-white activism is real enough to dedicate her column to the question, “What drives the men who think feminists and foreigners want to wipe them out?”
For the rapidly increasing number of white and normal people currently on message about White Genocide, Ms. Penny’s question is not only absurd, it is based on a false premise. The truth is that the vast majority of normal whites simply don’t care whether feminists and foreigners “want to wipe them out,” because neither “feminists” nor “foreigners” have any power. It is the fabulously wealthy white, anti-white traitors —who look like us but have no loyalty to us— who are chiefly responsible for the genocidal policies imposed on all and only white countries. White Genocide is a White-collar Crime.
Read more