Children from a school in the city of Emmen, Switzerland, were asked to decorate a concrete wall by painting musical instruments on it.
“Some of the children had the idea to paint a Swiss flag with an alpenhorn,” said Peter Jans, one of the project organizers. Another student then painted a doubled-headed Albanian eagle.
The school has students from 28 different countries, and other children asked to paint their flag on the wall as well.
“Then other students turned with a request to the Executive Board, if they would also be able to show their flag there” said Emmen’s Communications Officer, Walter Bucher.
There was no room for all the flags, so Jans was asked to “stop the project, so as not to penalize students of other nationalities.”
One night, the Swiss flag painting was vandalized by someone who painted the white cross red.
“Why should the flag bother anybody?” said Ursula Vanderbroeck, who has two sons at the school. “The flag belongs to our country and is the identity of the people who live here.”
The mayor, Rolf Born agrees: “Personally, I see neither the Swiss cross or Albanian eagle on the school wall as a big problem.”
Things like this happen all the time, and still certain politicians insist that “diversity is our strength”.
I’ll tell you what “diversity” is: it’s a code word for White genocide.
No one is trying to “diversify” Africa, East Asia, South Asia, the Middle east, or Latin America. No one cares that these countries have closed border and do not have different groups living in their countries.
In politics, “diversity” is all about White people – getting rid of us that is. And that’s precisely why it’s White genocide.
Agoravox, a French news site is reporting that Doctor Thierry Lecoquierre from Upper Normandy, France, has been taken by the police following his call to rape “right-wing” females to create “multicolored descendants.”
It is unclear whether he has been arrested or is just answering their questions.
Dr Lecoquirre’s article was titled “Impregnate the female of the National Front” and was published on the 8th of December. The police found his article and took him in for questioning 2 days later, on the 10th of December.
“Right wing women do not appear less mammal than other women, even if they have a bigger than average reptilian brain ” he wrote in his article.
“Let’s sexually overcome these stupid right wing females”
“Blacks, Negroes, gooks, Jews, leftists, gypsies, disabled, Freemasons and even my gay friends, in solidarity: bring up your hard dicks! Let our consciences sleep under the pillow, and jump on the right-wing pussies offered. Hail to a vast altruistic copulation. Provide multicolored descendants to the sinking country of France.”
“With one goal: kill right-wing poison in the egg.”
According to Agoravox, Lecoquierre claimed his article was supposed to be “ironic“.
It was published on L’obs Le Plus, and like all blog articles on the site it was not checked by the editorial team first. It has since been removed.
The anti-Whites would love this guy if he just called for “multicolored descendants” to be made, but he takes it a step too far, even for them.
You see, anti-Whites have an agenda called “diversity” whereby they try to open the borders of majority White countries and flood them with non-White immigrants, then try to encourage us all to “integrate” into one big “mixed-race melting pot”.
What this amounts to is simply a campaign of White Genocide. Certain influential people within politics, all across the Western world, have deliberately targeted White areas for “diversity”, and this certainly fits the legal definition of genocide.
You will never hear anyone scream for “diversity” in Africa or Asia. “Diversity” is a codeword for White genocide because it’s only about getting rid of White areas and White countries.
This week In #WhiteGenocide - 5
Playing the Trump Card Against #WhiteGenocide
Horus - @eurorabbit
Enoch - @J_Enoch_Powell
Asgardian - @warowhites
FashGordon - @ratlinesmemes
Truck Roy - StormFront Radio
Special Guest - ElectrE B.B - @ElectrelsMore
:30 - Introduction
1:45 - Multiculturalism, Trump, Action-Reaction-Solution
11:50 - Mindset of Power & Political Victory
15:30 - Goy Friends - Oy Vey
19:15 - Energy Flow and Trump Control
25:00 - Haircuts, Homos and Mainstream National Socialism
37:04 - Elite Wild Cards & "White Kid" Preservation
46:02 - The Resistance vs. The Beta Male Machine
49:56 - All In The Family against #WhiteGenocide
51:20 - Special Guest ElectrE from France
Greg Paulson
Author’s note:
I borrowed a lot from Greg Johnson’s essay, Dealing with the Holocaust, which I think is important for a deeper understanding of the issue in general and for the position I advocate.
This may seem counter-intuitive, but a common mistake pro-White advocates make in combating White genocide is disputing the alleged facts of anti-White historical narratives.
By challenging the details of anti-White historical narratives, whether it be the Holocaust, the Black slave trade, genocide of American Indians or the various other alleged crimes committed by Whites against non-White populations, pro-White advocates are missing and implicitly accepting—the “premise: If white racism, nationalism, self-assertion, etc. led to the holocaust, the slave trade, Jim Crow, etc., then they are evil”—the underlying mechanism used to justify White genocide.
A far more effective point of argument is that regardless of the (alleged) crimes committed by White people in the past, they do not justify White genocide or any of its anti-White components.
Besides actually being a morally true statement, it registers as such to the vast majority of White people who were taught since childhood that, “Two wrongs don’t make a right.” This is a far more effective approach than trying to convince someone to question the historical “facts” that influenced the formation of their worldview and/or understanding of the world. Greg Johnson points out that
As a general rule, moral and political arguments are more convincing than historical or scientific arguments, because the latter require specialized knowledge and lengthy explanations, whereas the former can be pithily formulated and draw upon common moral and political intuitions—and generally people’s moral intuitions are healthier than the toxic moral swill ladled out by the churches, schools, and mass media.
Not only is it more effective and efficient, but it also works for every anti-White historical narrative anti-Whites use, and any more that may be invented in the future. So not only does the average White person we are trying to reach not need to spend hours researching a specific historical instance to justify what he feels is right, it also inoculates him against all other and future attempts at manipulation via anti-White historical narratives.
Additionally—and this is important—it brings the focus back to the present genocidal conditions faced by our people. It interrupts the autistic proclivity to get lost in the past and technicalities that understandably bore and annoy most people. We cannot afford to get distracted and bogged down in the past and lengthy explanations. We need that lightning focus that clearly and succinctly defeats anti-White arguments, exposing them for what they are. If we can do that and simultaneously help inoculate White people against this powerful demoralizing weapon, why wouldn’t we?
It is our own people’s grandiose propensity toward collective guilt and self-abasement that is the ultimate source of the power anti-White narratives have over us. To borrow further from Greg Johnson’s excellent essay, attacking the moral dimension of the problem is like hacking at the trunk of a tree, whereas revising historical narratives is akin to merely trimming the branches.
Once we have stopped the genocide of our people, our historians can determine what was true in the past. Until then, I encourage all of my fellow pro-White advocates to stop trimming the branches and join me in hacking away at the trunk.