Log in and get the latest edition of EndGame Exotica!
GEO = Geopolitical News
News & Views: Putin hits the Turks with Sanctions!
News & Views: Always on the Move!
comments have been enabled so feel free to sound off
Log in and get the latest edition of EndGame Exotica!
GEO = Geopolitical News
News & Views: Black Friday Special!
comments have been enabled so feel free to sound off
At the Museum of London, there are 22,000 human remains, some of which date back to the founding of the city of London by the Roman empire, about 2,000 years ago.
Scientists from Durham University, England, and from McMaster University, Canada, have been examining the remains of four people from the collection, and they have been able to work out certain things about them.
Of these four people’s remains they examined, two “had origins from outside Europe”, while one was from Britain, and the other one was from Continental Europe.
And that’s why the BBC are screaming about how London was an “ethnically diverse” city from its very beginning.
Instead of carrying any quotes from the scientists who conducted these tests, the BBC thought they’d rather ask the Museum of London’s Curator, because it lets them push their agenda.
“The thing to remember with the original Londoners is that they were not born here.” Caroline McDonald, the Museum’s Curator, told the BBC. “Every first-generation Londoner was from somewhere else – whether it was somewhere else in Britain, somewhere else on the continent, somewhere else in the Mediterranean, somewhere else from Africa,”
“So the stories we can tell about our ancient population are absolutely relevant to modern contemporary London because these are our stories – these are people just like us.”
Even if we ignore the fact that this “ethnically diverse from the beginning” propaganda is only backed up by the DNA of four people, there is also another problem with it. These two people who “had origins from outside Europe” were very likely to have been White anyway.
The scientists say that the 14 year-old girl who supposedly “had origins from outside Europe”, grew up in North Africa, but her DNA is much more similar to Southern and Eastern Europeans – not North Africans. She also had blue eyes.
The other so-called non-European was a 45 year-old man with brown hair and brown eyes. His mitochondrial DNA line was from North Africa, but he suffered from a bone disease that almost exclusively afflicts White males, particularly Western Europeans.
It’s ridiculous how this study has been twisted to suit the anti-White agenda of the BBC. They are trying to justify Britain being flooded with third-world immigrants.
Getting millions of non-White third-world immigrants to flood into Europe (also America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) is all a part of their White genocide agenda.
No, I do not mean that they are rounding us up and killing us in a huge bloodbath. I mean that this agenda is genocide. In international law, it’s not the methods that defines genocide – it’s what you hope to achieve with them.
Genocide simply means that someone is trying to get rid of a group. You’d have to be blind, deaf, and dumb not to see that White countries are exclusively targeted for mass immigration and “diversity” – but no one cares that a Black country like Liberia will only allow Black people to be citizens.
Who could deny that this is White genocide?