Swiss majority vote against mass immigration, which slows a requirement of White genocide.
Recently Swiss citizens voted for more restrictions on immigration, despite opposition from leaders of the European Union and others. Anti-Whites from inside and outside the country have called the campaign for immigration restrictions “racist”, and “xenophobic” in an attempt to scare the public to vote against the referendum.
A national referendum regarding immigration was passed, receiving the majority of the Swiss citizen’s votes. The vote has placed a cap on the number of immigrants allowed into Switzerland each year.
The law also allows judges to deport foreign criminals after they have served their prison sentence, among other laws regarding immigration.
Despite strong opposition from leaders of the European Union and United Nations, from the opposing Swiss political parties, and from Swiss big businesses, the people have spoken in favor of stopping White genocide in Switzerland.
While Switzerland is not a member of the EU, previously signed agreements requires it to have opened borders if they want to gain access to EU markets, so there is a possibility that the EU will boycott the Swiss in an attempt to force opened borders, massive non-White immigration, and forced assimilation on the Swiss (all policies are essential for White genocide to take place).
The Swiss People’s Party (Schweizerische Volkspartei), or SVP is planning the new laws for a variety of different reasons. The Justice Minister, Christoph Blocher, said he wants to soften “anti-racism” laws because they deny freedom of speech to citizens.
Dr Ulrich Schlüer, the man behind a famous Swiss poster campaign, wants tighter immigration laws because to stop violent sexual crimes like rape.
“In a suburb of Zürich, a group of youths between 14 and 18 recently raped a 13-year-old girl,” he said. “It turned out that all of them were already under investigation for some previous offense. They were all foreigners from the Balkans or Turkey. Their parents said these boys are out of control. We say: ‘That’s not acceptable. It’s your job to control them and if you can’t do that you’ll have to leave’. It’s a punishment everyone understands.”
Dr Schlüer also wants a referendum to ban the building of Minarets; a tall tower used by the Muslim Imams to issue a “call to prayer”
“We’re not against mosques but the minaret is not mentioned in the Koran or other important Islamic texts. It just symbolizes a place where Islamic law is established.” Dr Schlüer says, after opinion polls found that almost half of Swiss people want to ban minarets.
The UN’s special rapporteur on “racism” is asking for an official explanation from the government, after the UN deems the campaign to be “racist” and “xenophobic”.
The referendum was conducted after the SVP obtained 100,000 signatures.
When a country tries to control its borders – when it tries to stop White genocide – votes no longer matter to the anti-Whites. White genocide was not voted for, nor were the policies that lead to it. The public was expected to accept the genocide of an entire race of people, otherwise they were “ignorant”, but what they are “ignorant” of remains unclear.
The anti-Whites say they “anti-racist”, but they only seem to be interested in the “racism” problem, or “diversity” problem, or “equality” problem in White countries.
Are you White, South African, and being murdered? Nope, it’s not “racism”, according to anti-Whites – in fact they say it’s “racism” to oppose White South African genocide.
This is just more proof that anti-racist is just a codeword for anti-White – because it’s “racist” ONLY if White countries are to patrol their borders and kick out people they don’t want.
Image from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fl%C3%BCchtlingsdemo_Bern_2.JPG