Kalle Laanet, an Estonian politician, spoke at the International Migration Forum held in Tallinn. He told the audience that the question is not: Should Estonia take the African and the Middle Eastern immigrants (who illegally entered Southern Europe)? He said the question is: How will Estonia take the immigrants?
“Today the issue is not whether Estonia should receive the refugees coming to South Europe with other European countries, but how we should do it,” Laanet said.
“I am sure no one of us wants to think of what would have happened if the countries of Europe had turned their backs on those who left Estonia in the 1940s.”
This is silly. Europe took Estonian refugees who fled from their homes from a mass-murdering Communist dictatorship. So now Estonia must take African and Middle Eastern immigrants who passed through many safe countries on their way to Europe?
“In this way we can make Europe more unified and also be sure that others will come to help us without hesitation if we need it”
There are many excuses put out by these anti-Whites, but the bottom line is: if it’s a White country, it must have open borders.
Without open borders (and a high rate of non-White immigrants) it is hard for anti-Whites to “diversify” all those nasty majority White areas.
Anti-Whites believe that “diversity” means no area can be “too White”, but if that’s the case, then “diversity” is actually just a code word for White genocide.