AntiWhitePropSmallA few weeks ago, there was outrage when the town of Mundenheim controversially decided to evict elderly German citizens from a permanent homeless shelter.

The town’s government evicted them so they could turn their homes into a “refugee shelter”.

The mayor of the town of Nieheim, Rainer Vidal, has decided to do something similar.

He has terminated the tenancy of Germans living in low-income housing, so that fake refugees can move in.

I know that this is an unconventional measure,said Vidal, “But we have an obligation to accommodate refugees.

This has caused quite a scandal in Nieheim because there are many empty houses available, but they are apparently not good enough for the immigrants, so Germans must be evicted from their own homes.

Bettina Halbey, is a 51 year old nurse and single parent, and has lived in her Nieheim apartment for 16 years.

Since being told that she would be evicted from her home on May 2016 to make room for immigrants, she has spoken to media telling them that there are plenty of empty houses in the town.

She said this eviction notice was “was like a kick.

Here in Nieheim there are many vacant houses. In other cities, homes are rented” she said.

When speaking about Halbey’s situation, Mayor Vidal said “I find it very unfortunate that the tenant has sought their way into the public eye. We have given a generous period of [eviction] notice until May next year. We are also willing to help her in finding accommodation.

This White Genocide agenda that anti-Whites keep pushing is the reason why some Germans are being evicted from their homes.

Under our politically correct, anti-White tyranny – White people are now “fair game”.

We can be blamed for things we never personally did; we can be called names; we can be denied a job, and we can be evicted from our homes – all because the anti-White rulers do not want White people around any more.

These are all important points, but the one thing we should be standing on is that it is genocide – this crime has been very clearly defined in court, and it’s quite clearly happening to us.

h/t White GeNOcide Project

CPfMId7XAAAElwYDr. Kevin MacDonald, Ph.D. in Biobehavioral Sciences, is the editor and chief contributor of The Occidental Observer, which presents original content touching on themes of white identity, white interests, and the culture of the West. Tim Murdock is the host of White Rabbit Radio and the voice of Horus the Avenger, bringing awareness to White genocide through the widely circulated memes, "Diversity is a code word for White genocide" and "Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White” and other popular animations. John Friend is an independent blogger and journalist who maintains The Realist Report, focusing primarily on the events of 9/11, WWII revisionism, media deception and psychological warfare, power and influence of the Zionist Lobby in America, and the systematic assault upon traditional Western European civilization.

In this special roundtable discussion, we focus on the burgeoning immigrant invasion of Europe and the controlled mainstream media’s contrived web of lies covering the mess. We begin with a look at the design and tactics of the campaign that is pulling on the heartstrings of White Europeans, and signs that the official narrative is beginning to crumble as people wake up to the absurdity of the situation. John describes the press’ coverage of the crisis, which plainly indicates their ruling elites’ central role in promoting the resettlement of non-Whites in Europe and America. We discuss the absence of any MSM video footage that would shine a negative light on the hostile 'refugees,' a majority of whom are extremely aggressive male Muslims with a particular disdain for Europeans.

We get into the attacks on US presidential candidate Donald Trump for his open support of White interests, along with the hypocrisy of the outspoken political elite in regards to the demographic and economic questions of the immigration debate. Further, we look at the speed in which the Zionist agenda to overthrow the Middle East using Western capital is moving, and Tim points to indications that the managerial class is growing suspicious of the global agenda and the mission of multiculturalism for only European countries. Kevin emphasizes the history of cataclysmic social upheaval that has been created by Jews, and the ideology of past movements that have been aimed at deconstructing the ethnicity of the Western people. Then, our focus turns toward simple memes that can be used to counteract the psychological warfare that has brainwashed society to believe in the utopian dream of diversity. To round things off, we speculate on what moves the hostile elite could have up their sleeves in what is shaping up to be a full-on clash of civilizations on European homelands.

Click here for the interview

WhiteGenocide

White Genocide may sound like a conspiracy theory that’s popular among tin-foil hatted gentlemen, but when you move past this knee-jerk reaction, there is actually an alarming amount of truth to it.

Most people will tell you that genocide is a group of people being murdered in some way, but that is just the popularized version. Contrary to the popular misconception, genocide does not have to be violent or involve mass murder – it could be a series of political policies to get rid of a group.

If there is a plan to target a group for destruction, that is genocide. In this article, you should see this “behind the scenes” plan come to light.

Susan Sontag, a film maker and professor, once remarked that “The white race is the cancer of human history.

She did not say anything ground-breaking; she was merely summing up what a certain portion of the ruling class thinks of its White majority citizens.

They believe that White people are some kind of “cancer” which must be wiped out. Furthermore, they all agree that the solution to this “cancer” should be to get rid of all the White countries by allowing a massive scale of migration from non-White countries.

tkennedystats

General Wesley Clark, an ex-NATO commander who was involved in the bombing of Serbia, once let slip the real objective of his campaign.

There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states” he said. “That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.

Why Europe, specifically? Again, this is not a ground-breaking speech; many others have said the same thing, General Clark just said it more concisely.

By itself, moving different groups of people into White countries does not constitute genocide. What makes it genocide is that they then demand we “assimilate” with these non-White immigrants.

As one Israeli writer put it: “Sooner or later, their [immigrant’s] children and grandchildren will marry into veteran European families and change the demographics of their countries“, he said that this was “a good thing.

We have had quite a lot of influential people call for this. Like ex President of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, who said in a speech that “the goal is to meet the challenge of racial interbreeding“, and that “not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country.

Pretty blatant, right? But you’re probably saying that a quote from one politician doesn’t quite prove that there is a multi-national agenda to get rid of White people by blending us with other groups.

fr

Well, in Germany, Joschka Fischer, ex Foreign Minister and ex Vice Chancellor wrote in his book that “Germany is to be contained from the outside and heterogenized from the inside by influx, ‘diluted’ so to speak.

And then in Sweden there is Mona Sahlin, Party Leader of the Social Democrats, who said,the White majority is the problem” and they “must be integrated into the new Sweden; the old Sweden will not return.

swe1

And in Australia, Bill Hayden, ex Foreign Minister, said “Australian Asians and Europeans will marry another and a new race will emerge”. Australiawill become a Eurasian society and we will be the better for it.

At the time of Hayden’s remarks, the then Prime Minister, Bob Hawk, said that he was not going to allow a debate on this issue: “We will not allow to become a political issue in this country the question of Asianisation.

In other words, he was saying there must be no alternative viewpoint. What’s important to remember here is that this was just a few years after the cancellation of the White Australia immigration policy.

Still not convinced? Perhaps you should read more of what these anti-Whites say?

These quotes are just the tip of the iceberg. But where did this plan or agenda come from? It surely must have had a creator, or someone who originally popularized this idea among the ruling elite class?

Well maybe it did – the most shocking and revealing quote you may ever see is from as far back as 1925, and it is from the founder and president of the Pan-European Union (the precursor to the European Union).

The man I’m talking about is Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi. He wrote in one of his books that “The man of the future will be of mixed race … [it] will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

32144kalergi

Surely it was just an innocent prediction?

It may have been more than that because in 1925 he was said to have told a newspaper that “we intend to turn Europe into a mixed race…

That last quote by him cannot be confirmed, but one thing you might have noticed in his other quote is that he uses the word “diversity”. He is the first person we know of to use it in that context, and since then, that word has become the battle-cry of the anti-Whites.

Whenever they scream “diversity” we all know they’re really saying “lets get rid of the White majority”. It has never been directed at any other group of people.

Non-White Immigration into every single majority White country is at the highest rate it’s ever been in history, despite poll after poll showing that the majority of voters are against it.

Politicians refuse to close the borders, and will not accept that it is even an option. Because of this, White people are subject to being blended out of existence, and at the very least our children and our children’s children may never have a place which they can call home again.

10380152_334485016715620_3669276957080924089_o

We could be forced to walk the rest of our days as a minority in almost every, if not every country on the planet.

After reading this article it should become obvious to you that this so-called “conspiracy” has a great deal of evidence to support it. Hopefully, this article will open up a mainstream discussion about White genocide and its implications for future White children.

 

h/t White GeNOcide Project

RaceMixingWhite Nationalists are united in the belief that our race is threatened with simple biological extinction. This is often dismissed as alarmism, but, as I have shown, one can make a very simple and compelling argument that whites will go extinct if present trends continue. The purpose of White Nationalism is to interrupt those trends.

Some White Nationalists go one step further, arguing that our race is being intentionally driven to extinction, i.e., that whites are the targets of genocide. This claim too is dismissed as not just alarmist but crazy. Nevertheless, I shall argue that white genocide is actually happening. There are people in positions of power who are promoting policies that they know will lead to the extinction of the white race. Unless, of course, we stop them.

To establish the white genocide thesis, we must do three things. First, we need to define genocide in a way that is consistent with a slow process leading ultimately to extinction. Second, we need to show that white extinction is not a mysterious force of nature but the result of human choices and actions. Third, we need to show that white extinction is not just an unforeseen, unintended consequence of these policies, but rather their deliberate, intentional effect.

It seems counter-intuitive to claim that whites are the victims of genocide. Whites are not being slaughtered by the millions, which is the image that most people have of genocide. To all appearances, our race is powerful, prosperous, and populous. But defenders of the White Genocide thesis point to the 1948 United Nations Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which in Article II defines genocide as

. . . any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; . . .

This definition of genocide is much broader than outright mass murder. In particular, points (c) and (d) are consistent with characterizing policies that destroy a group slowly, over long periods of time, as genocidal as well. So genocide comes in two forms, which we can call fast, hot genocide and slow, cold genocide. White extinction falls into the latter category.

Keep reading this post